Bellevue Milestone Two.docx by Veronica Horne

Bellevue Milestone Two.docx by Veronica Horne

Submission date: 22-May-2020 09:25PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1330235391 File name: Bellevue_Milestone_Two.docx (21.54K) Word count: 714 Character count: 4325

 

 

 

2

 

 

3

4

5

6

 

 

7

8

 

 

9

 

 

8% SIMILARITY INDEX

1% INTERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICATIONS

8% STUDENT PAPERS

1 5%

2 3%

Exclude quotes On

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

Bellevue Milestone Two.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University – Continuing Education Student Paper

Submitted to Kaplan University Student Paper

 

 

FINAL GRADE

/60

Bellevue Milestone Two.docx GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Strikethrough.

Comment 2

I could not agree with your more; they do very well in this department.

PAGE 3

Comment 3

yes, this has had an impact on all industries; especially healthcare.

Comment 4

how did you come to this conclusion? you want to be sure to include sources to validate.

Comment 5

I like the idea but is this something they as well as other hospitals are doing?

Comment 6

this is good but it is not in the form of SMART goals. For example, you needed to include specifics like, to decrease the number of case by 10% by December 2020. Please take another look at the course material.

PAGE 4

Comment 7

You needed to identify the competition. Please be sure to include within the final milestone.

Comment 8

 

 

you are missing two sections (alignment and ethics; not including had an impact on your grade.

PAGE 5

Comment 9

remove the line; when citing a title, only the first word, proper nouns, and words after a colon are capitalized.

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

 

 

RUBRIC: ARTICLE REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC

CRITERION 1 (16%)

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

CRITERION 2 (16%)

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

CRITERION 3 (16%)

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

CRITERION 4 (16%)

0 / 100.002

0 / 100

Summarizes the context and content of the selected article

Understands with limited effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a limited degree of effectiveness

• Understands with some effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with some degree of effectiveness

Understands with adequate effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a considerable effectiveness

Understands with a high degree of effectiveness • Identifies the main points of the articles with a high degree of effectiveness

0 / 100

Information on sources

Contains incorrect info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.

Contains mostly somewhat correct info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date

Contains all correct info regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.

Contains all correct information regarding article title, author name, and article source and date.

0 / 100

• Analyzes the article in terms of the themes, info and ideas in the text and other sources employed • Uses ideas from the article and applies them to corresponding issues in entrepreneurship

• Analyses the information with limited effectiveness • Uses ideas from the article highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship with little effectiveness

• Analyses the information somewhat effectively • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship somewhat effectively

• Analyses the information considerably • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship effectively

Analyses information clearly and effectively • Uses ideas from the article to highlight to the reader about pertinent issues in entrepreneurship to a very high of effectiveness

0 / 100

 

 

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

CRITERION 5 (16%)

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

CRITERION 6 (16%)

SCALE 1 (25)

SCALE 2 (50)

SCALE 3 (75)

SCALE 4 (100)

Communication of the analysis and synthesis is clear and concise and identifies and explains the correlation or diversity of ideas pertaining to highlights of article reviewed

Communicates information and ideas with limited effectiveness

Communicates information and ideas with some effectiveness

Communicates information and ideas with considerable effectiveness

Communicates information and ideas highly effectively

0 / 100

Grammar and mechanics

Contains numerous errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation; substantially interferes with report’s readability.

Contains frequent errors in grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation; errors begin to interfere with report’s readability.

Contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation most of the time; errors do not interfere with report’s readability.

Consistently contains accurate and proper grammatical conventions, spelling, and punctuation.

0 / 100

APA style for references and citations

Consistently fails to use APA for references/citation

Inconsistently uses APA formatting for citations/references

Consistently uses APA for citations/ references

Clearly and consistently uses proper APA formatting for citations/references

 

  • Bellevue Milestone Two.docx
    • by Veronica Horne
  • Bellevue Milestone Two.docx
    • ORIGINALITY REPORT
    • PRIMARY SOURCES
  • Bellevue Milestone Two.docx
    • GRADEMARK REPORT
      • FINAL GRADE
      • GENERAL COMMENTS
        • Instructor
    • RUBRIC: ARTICLE REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC 0 / 100.002

Looking for a similar assignment? Get help from our qualified experts!

"Our Prices Start at $9.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!":

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper